Sponsor records · Manual snapshot · Checked 21 September 2026
Green Party immigration policy: sponsor records (2026)
The Green Party’s published pledges cover visa fees charged at cost, removal of minimum income requirements and an end to the hostile environment. None is a sponsor record-keeping instruction, and the party publishes no sponsor-duty position. Treat these as cost and review triggers only if implemented.
Last updated .
Announcement register
What is pledged, and what would it ask of a record?
On smaller screens, scroll the table sideways to see every column.
| Pledge | Source and status | Record question if implemented |
|---|---|---|
| Visa fees charged at cost | Summary of the 2024 general election manifesto, 12 Jun 2024: application fees charged “at cost”, without a profit margin. Party pledge. | This is a cost-model input, not a record field. Keep any revised figure in a dated scenario, separate from the fees actually paid and evidenced on a worker’s file. |
| Minimum income requirements removed | Same manifesto, 12 Jun 2024: removal from all applications, including for spouses of work-visa holders. Concerns applicant and family evidence. | Appendix D record keeping does not turn on a spouse’s income. Do not begin collecting household financial information because a party has pledged to remove a requirement. |
| End to the hostile environment | Same manifesto, 12 Jun 2024, alongside abolition of the No Recourse to Public Funds condition. The pledge does not name employer right-to-work checks or sponsor record keeping. | The open question for sponsors is whether employer checks and Appendix D retention would fall within scope. The published pledge does not say, so there is nothing to design against. Keep current checks unchanged. |
| No newer announcement located | Institute for Government explainer, 15 Oct 2025: neither the Green Party nor the Liberal Democrats had announced new settlement or citizenship policies since the general election. Rechecked 21 Sep 2026. | A recorded absence is not a change. Log the date you checked so the next review starts from a known point rather than repeating the search. |
Last verified 21 September 2026. Sourcing limitation: the party’s own policy archive now sits behind a member login and its migration policy working group site redirects to the party homepage, so the pledges above are cited from a dated Electronic Immigration Network summary rather than the party’s primary text. Read the party’s own material for its full scope. Record questions are Soteriaa’s editorial inferences, not duties.
Keep the two apart
A fee pledge is not a record duty
Changing what a visa costs and changing what a sponsor must retain are different things.
The hostile-environment pledge is the one that could in principle reach employer checks, and it is also the one stated least specifically. That combination is a reason to log it and wait, not to anticipate it. For what is actually required today, use the government register; to compare statuses across parties, return to the tracker.
- Keep cost scenarios in a dated planning note, not on a worker’s file.
- Evidence the fees actually paid, not the fees a party proposes.
- Do not collect additional personal or financial information on the strength of a pledge.
- Wait for applicable final rules before revising any check or retention period.
How strong is the source for each row?
The three parties added on 21 September 2026 publish less sponsor-specific material than the government, the Conservatives or Reform UK, and two of their own websites could not be read in full on that date. Each row above therefore states what kind of source it rests on — a party policy document, an election manifesto, an adopted motion, a remark reported by a third party, or a recorded absence of any published position. A weaker source is not a weaker duty; it is not a duty at all. Where a party’s own text was unreachable, a dated secondary source is cited and identified as one, and the gap is named rather than filled by inference.
How to use this dated tracker
This is a selected, manually checked register, not a live feed or a complete statement of immigration law. Party sources establish what a party announced; they do not establish a legal obligation. Suggested record questions are Soteriaa’s editorial interpretation, not new duties. Recheck official sources before acting and whenever guidance, bill stages or commencement dates change. Soteriaa sells document and tracking software and does not endorse a party. Soteriaa provides document and workflow tools, not legal assistance or compliance advice. It helps organise records, evidence and deadlines; it does not determine compliance, certify records or submit official reports on your behalf. You review the information and remain responsible for required checks and submissions.